The agreement is the unit of review
A clause rarely fails on its own.
The issue may appear in Clause 9, sit in the definition of Loss, and surface again in a schedule. Agmt maps the document before it marks it up, so a local fix does not create a new problem elsewhere.
From instruction to tracked change.
Set the mandate.
Tell Agmt who you act for, the document, the stage and the commercial context.
Let it map the agreement.
Agmt reads the structure, defined terms, usages, cross-references and overlapping mechanisms before reaching a view.
Review the evidence.
Each finding shows the exact wording, why it matters, the proposed narrow fix and the reviewer’s verdict.
Apply in Word.
Accept, edit or reject each proposal. If the document changed or the target is ambiguous, Agmt refuses the write.
Built for the work that reaches signing.
Review
Full agreement review, focused clause review and interpretation — with related provisions checked before an issue is recorded.
Draft
Draft from an instruction, make a surgical inline amendment or prepare concise Word comments without rewriting what already works.
Negotiate
Analyse counterparty markup, prepare negotiation positions and call notes, and summarise agreed changes.
QC
Run a near-final pass for placeholders, numbering, cross-references, amount mismatches and defined-term drift.
Deterministic where it should be
Some defects do not need an opinion.
Agmt can check exact mechanical failures without asking a model:
Fast, repeatable and useful before the document goes out for signature.
Evidence before confidence
A finding should be inspectable before it is actionable.
- ✓Exact document wording is quoted back and verified before an edit can be applied.
- ✓A separate reviewer can confirm, narrow or drop a provisional finding.
- ✓Every document write requires the lawyer’s approval.
- ✓Stale, ambiguous or protected targets are refused rather than guessed.
- ✓The Word pane is the writing surface; shared web reports are read-only.
The next draft should not start from zero
Carry the matter, not just the prompt.
Agmt keeps the document versions, review history, dispositions and evidence-backed house positions that matter to the next round. Prior choices remain visible; deal-specific instructions do not silently become universal rules.
Why Agmt exists
Built from a transaction lawyer’s workflow.
Agmt began with a simple frustration: agreement tools could find language, but they did not take responsibility for the document as a whole. The product is being built around the way transactional lawyers actually review, negotiate and close — in Microsoft Word, through precise markup, with judgment left visible.— Abhinav, founder
Private beta
Help shape the reviewer you would keep open in Word.
We are inviting a small group of transactional lawyers to test Agmt on representative, appropriately anonymised documents and tell us where it earns — or loses — trust.